Search for: "Farley v. Doe"
Results 21 - 40
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2010, 10:00 am
The court of appeals relied on Harmelin v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:38 am
King Farley v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:43 am
It is clear after Matal v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 5:30 pm
Mgmt. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 11:01 am
U.S. law does not specifically prohibit American citizens from becoming mercenaries, and thus the situation lies in murky legal territory. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 6:21 pm
The decision is Colasanto v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:53 am
Lee v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
In Kellogg Co. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 11:21 am
What does this mean exactly? [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 11:17 pm
Sarah Farley. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
(See the briefs and amicus briefs filed in the Jack Daniel’s case, and Part I of my paper with Professor Farley.) [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
Farley, 352 F. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:54 pm
Radostitz then cited Kyles v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 10:56 am
PTO got it right. https://t.co/4TdCl7b8Ks — Christine Farley (@Prof_Farley) May 9, 2017 Trademark law does not give you ways to “own” clever — or asinine — phrases or slogans. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:05 am
During oral argument in Kentucky v. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 9:38 am
Over at The Fire of Genius, Joe Miller has a series of posts, inspired by the briefs in KSR International v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 7:23 am
When does it refer to the origin of the design v. the design itself? [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:21 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
