Search for: "Farmer v. State for Use of Russell" Results 21 - 40 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
At The National Law Review, Jana Slavina Farmer discusses the court’s opinions in two copyright cases this term, Rimini Street Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 1:24 pm by Amy Howe
” The two companies were sued for buying cocoa from, and providing assistance to, farmers in the Ivory Coast, who used child labor trafficked from Mali. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which “centers on the federal government taking water developed and stored solely for irrigation uses authorized through the 1905 Klamath Project,” and “to protect the private property rights of farmers and ranchers in the Western states. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., as courts in at least seven states (including the court below) hold; or, instead, (2) use the rational-factfinder test of Jackson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
Beth Farmer analyzes Monday’s argument in Ohio v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” At Governing, Liz Farmer reports that South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Branch    Western District of Kentucky at Louisville 08a0288p.06 2008/08/12 Russell v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
  More of what we used to produce ourselves will be imported. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
In Horne, California farmers seek just compensation for the seizure of part of their raisin crop under USDA “marketing orders,” as the case makes its second trip up from the farm league. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
Smith of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who presided over United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:35 pm by Andrew Hamm
Brawner 21-1210Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should apply the subjective test for deliberate indifference set forth in Farmer v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
After losing in the trial and appellate courts, petitioners seek cert. on the issue of “[w]hether the Commerce Clause allows California to impose a complete ban on the sale of wholesome USDA-approved poultry products from other States and countries … based solely on the agricultural methods used by out-of-state farmers who raise their animals entirely beyond California’s borders. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm by Law Lady
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING THROUGH FARM SERVICE AGENCY, f/k/a FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Appellee. 1st District.Attorney Disqualification: BOFA SEEKS TO OUST AIG LAW FIRM FROM $10 BILLION CASE, AIG v. [read post]