Search for: "Farrow v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2017, 12:37 pm by Bernie Burk
  For as the Times is now reporting (here), in July of this year Boies’ firm had retained Black Cube on Weinstein’s behalf, hiring them for what the contract Boies signed stated were the “primary objectives” of providing “intelligence which will help the client’s efforts to completely stop the publication of a new negative article in a leading NY Newspaper” (which Farrow identifies as the Times) and obtaining content from a book that… [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:50 am by Philip Segal
The nightmare scenario is the famed Winnie the Pooh case in California, Stephen Schlesinger, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Max Hill v Mail on Sunday,  A Man v The Gazette (Paisley) Ward v Mail on Sunday. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
In 2003, LegalZoom received a “cease and desist” order from the North Carolina State Bar on the basis that its non-licensed “legal technicians” were actively involved in document review and preparation.[12] The Missouri Federal Court later upheld the order on a motion for summary judgment, agreeing that LegalZoom’s platform went beyond a “do-it-yourself” service and crossed the boundary of unauthorized practice.[13] The result of the federal court… [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:30 am by Walter Olson
As of late October Trump campaign had been badly outspent by Clinton, with Super PAC money favoring her by more than 3-1 [Bloomberg] Clinton v. [read post]
Perfection is usually completed by filing a UCC-1 with the Secretary of State’s office. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
As Justice Fish stated in Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd v Ontario, “In every constitutional climate, the administration of justice thrives on exposure to light — and withers under a cloud of secrecy. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:30 am by Doorey
 reflex, (1991), 103 NSR (2d) 336 (NSSC);Tolman v Gearmatic, [1986] BCJ No. 481 (BCCA); Danroth v Farrow Holdings Ltd. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:20 am by Simon Chester
Catherine McKinnon summarized the state of initiatives relating to the use of technology in court processes. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
But, as Farrow points out, there’s no reason why law has to be practiced as though the world is in a constant state of emergency. [read post]