Search for: "Fears v. Box*"
Results 21 - 40
of 536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2017, 11:43 am
Fear always makes exceptions. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 10:02 am
” Citing Kimzey v. [read post]
26 Nov 2021, 8:48 am
In Tanner v. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
On 28 February 2013 the Court of Appeal delivered judgment in Waterson v Lloyd [2013] EWCA Civ 136. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:01 am
In Damus v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:51 am
U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:31 pm
An officer may conduct a limited pat-down search of the outer clothing for weapons during an investigative detention if the officer fears for his safety or that of others.An arrest, on the other hand, is a greater restraint upon a person's freedom to leave or move. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm
(quoting Mozes v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
¶ 15; Michael Kimble Tr. 38:21–39:1 (“[Harold Green] feared . . . a repeat of the Holocaust. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:27 pm
Then again, what's this got to do with Watters v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 8:22 am
” Case citation: People v. [read post]
17 May 2014, 12:00 am
Surveillance State, confirmed my fears, and moved me a notch or two off my sense of resignation.I’ve watched Greenwald’s career with a puzzled sense of suspicion and envy. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:36 am
The Court’s ruling in Gill v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:47 pm
There is a strong argument that the police need to be able to get on with their jobs without fear of being sued at a later date, or having to constantly attend court to defend claims. [read post]
23 May 2013, 8:25 am
Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 3:04 am
In such a scenario, the fear was that design alternatives would not be sufficient to avoid Article 8 CDR. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:09 pm
Airport officials feared the souvenirs would send the wrong message. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 2:14 pm
Birmingham City Council v Wilson [2016] EWCA Civ 1137 In Pieretti v Enfield LBC [2010] EWCA Civ 1104 (our note) the Court of Appeal held that under (the predecessor to) the Equality Act, in the course of Housing Act 1997 Part VII inquiries, a reviewing officer was required to carry out inquiries into an applicant’s disability that the Housing Act 1996 had not previously required, i.e. where the applicant had not raised the issue but the reviewing… [read post]
