Search for: "Federal Trade Commission v. Lead Express, Inc. et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Tan Phu Cuong Investment, LLC et al. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
Last week Fairplay Canada filed an application with the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), asking for a new tool to help Canadian creators to combat online theft of their content by illegal piracy websites. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
[xiv] The DOJ’s private equity healthcare antitrust concerns have also been echoed by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”). [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:19 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
Praxair Canada Inc., [1998] O.J. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
For example, in the 2015 case Harris v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
BIC USA, Inc., 136 F.Supp.2d 196, 207-208 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) (Consumer Product Safety Commission) (“The CPSC regulations establish general, rudimentary and minimal requirements. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm
See Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
The holding could also remove some of the Commission’s leverage in negotiating settled enforcement actions. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
There is no expressive element deserving copyright protection in each listing. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
The Equustek decision, Google Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
Dietary supplement manufacturers should be familiar with the requirements under both DSHEA and the Federal Trade Commission Act that they have substantiation that labeling and advertising claims are truthful and not misleading. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
