Search for: "Feinstein v. State Bar"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2018, 9:58 am
One of the most notable ambiguities in Kavanaugh's record is the question of what he really thinks about the validity of the United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:49 am
One of the term’s major cases was Janus v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:05 pm
The central issues of Apple v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:31 am
In Defense One, Patrick Tucker describes how the Burr-Feinstein encryption resembles Chinese law. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 6:30 am
United States (June 22, 2018). [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
” (I do not accept this framework in all of its respects—especially the conclusion that an elected official is barred from taking “purely partisan” actions—but I will work with it here.) [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 7:40 am
In Powell v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:16 pm
Carlisle v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Writing for the Brookings Institution, Lisa V. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Dianne Feinstein of California – grilled her on the role of her Catholic faith in judging. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 5:39 pm
In Whyte v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
Hasday* When the State of California and Planned Parenthood recently sued the Trump Administration over regulations implementing an abortion gag rule,[1] they must have thought they had a good chance before the famously liberal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm
” U.S. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
Two witnesses—a former State Department official and Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS—declined to be interviewed, but there is no suggestion in the report, or in the inspector general’s testimony, that this altered the outcome of the investigation. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
Feinstein, Mr. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:00 pm
Here—and unlike plaintiffs in the Supreme Court’s Clapper v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill · Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University · Ingraham v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
In Katz v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
