Search for: "Fells v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 7,319
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2021, 7:33 pm
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Other crimes Roderick King was convicted by a jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City of the following crimes related to an armed carjacking and nonfatal shooting of a woman in the Fells Point area: attempted first-degree murder, first-degree assault, reckless endangerment, armed carjacking, conspiracy ... [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 9:43 am
State. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:12 am
One of the more recent cases is that of Winter v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:03 am
In yet another case arising from Operation Durango (a government-run sting that lured hopeful immigrants into "bribing" brokers), the court had sympathy for the applicant who fell for the sting operation, but the court faulted the lawyer's inadequate development of legal theories to challenge the sting and referred the matter to the state bar. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 8:55 am
Merlino v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:00 am
Marzell v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 6:17 am
In Weakley v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dispatched this argument by citing Neal v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
In Trump v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 9:47 pm
Maguire v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:14 pm
As reported by a local Vermont paper, there is an interesting development going on in a federal capital case in Vermont, United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:24 pm
In State v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 5:33 am
., Associate Attorney at the Verdin Law Firm, LLC On December 12, 2011, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Judulang v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:55 am
In Hood v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:23 am
’” State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:23 am
’” State v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
(ii) The narrow vires ground Previously, in the case of Alvi v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2208, the Supreme Court had held that if a matter fell within the scope of s 3(2) of the 1971 Act, it must be regulated in the Immigration Rules and could not be validly regulated by other means, such as by the Secretary of State’s policy. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:51 am
In Holloway v. [read post]
