Search for: "Ferguson v. C. I. R" Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  I previewed RJR Nabisco v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:17 pm by Joe Patrice
" I don't think that'll pass. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am by Thornhill Law Firm, A PLC
I’m concerned about ground-level offices and shopping centers and small businesses. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
I considered adding a sidebar gadget that would show all the tags, but I saw that there were over 3,000 of them. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Legal Beagle
OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION [2013] CSOH 28 P47/12 OPINION OF LORD DRUMMOND YOUNG in the Petition of Mr William MacReath Petitioner; for Judicial Review of a decision of the Law Society of Scotland Act: Ferguson QC, Watts; Simpson & Marwick, Alt: Lindsay QC; Anderson Strathern LLP (Law Society of Scotland) Alt: Miss C, personally (Interested Party)  20 February 2013 [1] The petitioner seeks judicial review of a decision of the Law Society of Scotland dated 10 January… [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
I find myself in agreement with much of what Faza says, but I wanted to look at the question through the lens of copyright law. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by INFORRM
  Mr Pell’s answer was “George Carman QC who defeated them in high profile jury trials: Walker & ors v Yachting World, Branson v Snowden & G Tech and R v Ken Dodd respectively”. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, LondonDocket: 09-945Issue(s): Whether Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act is an “Act of Congress” subject to the anti-preemption provision of the McCarran-Ferguson Act.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (5th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replySupplemental brief for petitioner Title: Hogan v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
(c) A possible alternative This is my proposal (well, I say it’s mine, but it’s kind of derived from a paper published in 1993 by Patricia Ferguson, strangely never heard of again, in the LQR) and again it is doctrinal “theory”. [read post]