Search for: "Few v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of"
Results 21 - 40
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
Social Security And Taxes Many senior citizens preparing for retirement may not realize that their Social Security income could be taxable under certain conditions. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
A few sharp legal observers have suggested, in advance, that in one pending case, Welch v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:25 pm
Internet and Social Media The Government has announced that legislation to place age restrictions on online pornography which was due to come into effect on 15 July 2019 now be delayed for up to 6 months after an administrative error. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
According to Conwell, his first fund raised money from a diverse group of investors via Rule 506(c) of Regulation D and a social media campaign (Rule 506(c) allows for general solicitation in some instances). [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
RLY, the governance token for the Rally social token platform. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
As is customary, I will note that my views are my own, and I am not speaking on behalf of my fellow Commissioners or the staff. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:49 am
V establishes an indiscriminate data retention obligation, which unjustifiably infringes on the right to privacy and the presumption of innocence. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 11:41 am
Commissioner (which the IRS lost and lost again) and AICPA v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
A few brief observations: 1. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 5:21 am
See Morse v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:53 am
I give the highlights of two new and eminently contestable cyberlaw rulings: In U.S. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 2:55 am
This is due to the somewhat complicated interplay between New Jersey’s workers’ compensation laws and the Federal Social Security Act. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:24 am
“We hope that the national steps still needed to make this decision will be taken rapidly within the next few days. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:46 pm
Commissioner of Social Security, decided on July 8. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm
So how do we get tech companies to start fighting surveillance in court, hardening their systems against surveillance, pushing back against the administration, and lobbying for real reform? [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has published updated guidance for using binding corporate rules as a data transfer mechanism. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm
The few imputations which were established were protected by qualified privilege. [read post]
