Search for: "Fields v. A S"
Results 21 - 40
of 17,163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2024, 8:18 pm
The Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling in Garland v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 6:04 am
The case is entitled Arble v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:25 am
” Citing Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am
The first national legislation on the protection of cultural heritage was adopted in 1945.[12]While progress in this field was gradual, the introduction of new legislation in 1981 sped up the development of cultural heritage protection. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 4:36 pm
Please submit your panel proposal(s) to Anne Kiefer (Anne.Kiefer@americanbar.org). [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"[W]here there is a conflict in the testimony and either of two inferences may be drawn, the duty of choosing between the inferences is the agency's, and the courts may not reject the agency's choice" (Matter of Fields v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 198 AD3d 454, 455 [1st Dept 2021]). [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"[W]here there is a conflict in the testimony and either of two inferences may be drawn, the duty of choosing between the inferences is the agency's, and the courts may not reject the agency's choice" (Matter of Fields v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 198 AD3d 454, 455 [1st Dept 2021]). [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:12 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:14 am
Samsung’s appeal from the High Court was intervened by the CJEU’s judgment in Louboutin v Amazon[2]. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:02 am
Supreme Court decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am
This analysis is consistent with recently published decisions by both the General Court and the Boards of Appeal on the topic, inter alia: mataharispaclub v EUIPO - Rouha (SpaClubMatahari), Gugler France v EUIPO - Gugler (GUGLER), R 1320/2022-4, CELESTINO, and R 470/2023-2, TOYA (fig.).Therefore, it is crucial for bad faith applicants to prioritise thorough, high-quality evidence collection for a successful case. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 2:08 am
The second note on Fuites de pétrole et fuite du temps: le point de départ de la prescription en cas de faits dommageables plurilocalisés à effets continus (Oil leaks and the passage of time: the starting point of the limitation period for plurilocal facts with continuous effects) then focuses on the judgement of the UK Supreme Court of May 10th, 2023 in the Jalla v Shell ([2023] UKSC 16) case. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:43 am
After the applicant filed their opening brief, the USPTO director requested that the case be remanded back to the ARP in order to "clarify the USPTO’s position on the proper analysis of [...] means-plus-function claims in the field of biotechnology, and particularly in the antibody art". [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
Put in terms underlying the Supreme Court’s famous decision in Marbury v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 3:55 pm
Poor Justice Kennedy gave the left Casey, Romer, Lawrence, Windsor, Whoel Woman's Health, Obergefell, and so much more, but his "legacy" was tarnished by Trump v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 12:19 pm
This is its newsletter dealing with recent developments in the field. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 7:50 am
Interdisciplinary approaches, integrating insights from legal studies, philosophy, sociology, and other relevant fields, are especially encouraged. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:50 pm
Starr v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 8:50 am
Russell’s team. [read post]
