Search for: "Fields v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue"
Results 21 - 40
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2012, 7:09 am
Perkins, 12-126), clarification of how the Internal Revenue Service calculates the foreign tax credit (PPL Corporation v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 pm
It's one thing for Thierry Breton, the EU internal market commissioner (and in some Brussels insider's opinion the most influential commissioner at the moment), to say that "in Europe, the bird will fly by [EU] rules" such as the Digital Services act. [read post]
7 Mar 2006, 4:17 pm
" Duberstein v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
” The news received wide international coverage. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
Fast forward almost 90 years, in Seila Law v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm
Circuits) that “trade or business” status under ERISA should be governed by a novel, multi-factor “investment plus-like” test rather than by this Court’s decisions defining “trade or business” status for purposes of Section 162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code; and (2) whether the First Circuit erred by holding, contrary to Whipple v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:01 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 11-747, appears to be yet another hold for United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:09 am
Internal Revenue Code authorizes the Commissioner to restate the claimed terms of purported transactions between commonly-owned businesses if "he determines that ... [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
By Yuha Jung, PhD This article compares the differences between 501(c)(3), community benefiting nonprofits, and 501(c)(7), social clubs, and applies them to discussing legal obligations in the field of art museums that are mostly 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
The New York Times reports on the race to develop stronger encryption techniques as the field of quantum computing continues to advance. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 1:20 pm
Ohio law specifically states that a qualifying institution or organization is a charitable, educational, or state or political subdivision making a charitable use of its property; as determined in Chagrin Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm
The report noted that Internal Revenue Code § 7433 provides that a taxpayer may bring a civil action for damages against the Federal Government if an officer or employee of the IRS recklessly or intentionally, or by reason of negligence, disregards any provision of the Internal Revenue Code or related regulation in connection with the collection of Federal tax. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
” He also mentioned the recent decision in SEC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Gittleman, Casenote, Home field advantage: determining the appropriate "turf” for Williams v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s statement in Reiter v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design… [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm
On the same day the Investigatory Powers Tribunal handed down judgment on compensation in the case of News Group Newspapers v Commissioner of Police ([2016] UKIPTrib 14_176-H). [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:46 pm
To achieve these same goals, groups such as Democracy21 and the Campaign Legal Center have promoted changes to the Internal Revenue Code, while the American Bar Association has encouraged Congress to make pertinent amendments to the Lobbying Disclosure Act. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc., [2008] 3 SCR 265 At the outset, it is appropriate to refer to the words of Judson J. for this Court in Commissioner of Patents v. [read post]
