Search for: "Fields v. Commonwealth of Virginia" Results 21 - 40 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2007, 1:21 pm
Virginia Lawyers Weekly has a cover story this week about the new Virginia law with some odd new requirements on how to notarize documents. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:22 am by Emily Hammond
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday morning in Virginia Uranium Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 10:02 am by Emily Hammond
On November 5, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 8:04 am
 At the scene of the crash, Appellant was administered two types of field sobriety tests, which he failed. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 10:57 am
In accordance with Senate Joint Resolution (SJR) 333 of the 1999 General Assembly, the Commission embarked on an empirical study of recidivism among sex offenders convicted in the Commonwealth. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:48 pm by Peter J. Louie, Esq.
Still, Virginia courts recognize that it is unconstitutional to run roadblocks that give the officers in the field discretion. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:48 pm by Peter J. Louie, Esq.
Still, Virginia courts recognize that it is unconstitutional to run roadblocks that give the officers in the field discretion. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:54 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia Cheryl A. [read post]
7 May 2008, 9:00 pm
Stalsbroten, 978 P.2d 1059, 1061 (Wash. 1999) (refusal evidence admissible; no Fifth Amendment violation); but see Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
But some permissible reasons are imaginable: Virginia might, for example, be collecting data on interracial marriages as part of a broader interest in assessing the character of race relations in the Commonwealth and tracking changes over time. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 3:14 pm by Michael Froomkin
He represented the Commonwealth in several major lawsuits in state and federal court, including Massachusetts v. [read post]