Search for: "Fields v. Hobbs"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2012, 6:00 am
Hobbs, two cases challenging the constitutionality of sentencing 14 year olds to LWOP for homicide offenses (see http://jlc.org/legal-docket/miller-v-alabama-jackson-v-hobbs). [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:46 am
Curran, a deputy attorney general from Little Rock, arguing for the state in the case of Holt v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 10:00 pm
Full administrative separation of responsibilities for ownership and market regulation is therefore a fundamental prerequisite for creating a level playing field for SOEs and private companies and for avoiding distortion of competition. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 7:03 pm
Violate human otherness as an ethical criterion means enter the field of violence. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Fields originated at work; and the knife used in the assault was used at work, thus “facilitating the assault. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:05 am
I show speeches to show the art of persuasion, my field of study. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
Hobbs (5-4) (joint opinion): Eighth Amendment prohibits a legislature from making life without parole the mandatory sentence for a juvenile homicide offender. [read post]
2 May 2008, 11:03 am
Evans, V. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am
” Late last week the Justices also fielded requests for them to step into disputes over voting in North Carolina and Wisconsin. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am
Hobbs) and employment context (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 8:20 am
She's not sure how that affected likelihood of success, though she can think of more injunctions granted in related fields than in unrelated ones. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Baylor, No. 07-3002 Defendant's convictions for interfering with commerce by robbery, in violation of the Hobbs Act, and using a firearm in relation to a crime of violence are affirmed over meritless claims that: 1) the requirement of a de minimis effect on interstate commerce under the Hobbs Act is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court's decision in US v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Fields, No. 07-10384 The denial of Defendant's motion to vacate his drug sentence based on ineffective assistance of counsel is affirmed, where Defendant's counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise an Apprendi objection that the Court of Appeals had previously rejected. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
We made our best Calvin and Hobbes face at this unappetising decision here.2. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
Rose v. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
“Supreme Court and PTO Produce New Rules on ‘Laws of Nature’ Patents”by Alisa Melekhina, RegBlog Staff (April 19) In its decision in Mayo Collaborative Serv. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:31 pm
The Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys appealed to the Appointed Person (Geoffrey Hobbs QC, whose decision of 27 May you can study here. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
(Compare Constantine V. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
As we learn a new field, such as law, we master a large number of abstractions (or chunks) which can ease discussions with others in the profession. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
