Search for: "Fields v. Warden"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
Francis v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:46 am
Curran, a deputy attorney general from Little Rock, arguing for the state in the case of Holt v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Olmstead v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
P. 35(b) motion claiming that warden's alleged promise to create an opportunity for a sentence reduction as a reward for his assistance in prison effectively bound the government to file a Rule 35(b) motion on his behalf, judgment denying relief is affirmed where: 1) even if the warden did promise to file a Rule 35(b) motion, a warden within the Bureau of Prisons was unauthorized to make the motion as the "government" under Rule 35(b); and 2) a… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Maples v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 2:10 pm
Fields, ___ N.C. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:57 pm
Lightbourne v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am
Kimble v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
Garcia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
The report elaborates on allegations that ICDC staff were subjected to retaliation after speaking out about conditions at the facility, explaining: “We found that most of the ICDC staff we interviewed did not report fear of retaliation; most said they were comfortable bringing their concerns to either their supervisors or directly to the warden. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Grant of habeas relief vacating petitioner's sentence of death, and ordering that he be resentenced to receive a sentence other than death, is affirmed where the Double Jeopardy Clause bars respondent-warden's claim that, even though petitioner was found to be mentally retarded on direct appeal, Ohio should be permitted to relitigate the finding now that it has taken on new legal significance in light of Atkins v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, 438 F.2d 786 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 408 U.S. 942 (1972). [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:45 am
McGirt v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 12:16 pm
From Amin v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
The Court filled out the field with ocho ocho ocho new relists. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am
V. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
" Dissent: Whatever the Fifth said, there's two meanings of "necessary," and this ain't the one from McCulloch v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:19 am
Lord Denning Jarvis v. [read post]
