Search for: "Fifield v. Premier Dealer Services, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 9:23 am by Peter (Pete) A. Steinmeyer
Premier Dealer Services, 2013 IL App. (1st) 120327  that, absent other consideration, two years of employment are required for a restrictive covenant to be supported by adequate consideration, regardless of whether the covenant was signed at the outset of employment or after, and regardless of whether the employee quit or was fired. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am by Zachary C. Jackson
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., an Illinois Appellate Court determined that, absent other consideration, at-will employment must continue for two years in order to constitute consideration for the enforcement of competition restrictions. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:18 am by Zachary C. Jackson
Premier Dealer Services, Inc., an Illinois Appellate Court determined that, absent other consideration, at-will employment must continue for two years in order to constitute consideration for the enforcement of competition restrictions. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am by Robert B. Milligan and Daniel P. Hart
§ 1831(a) and 1832(a) of the EEA and for “misappropriation of a trade secret that is related to a product or service used in, or intended for use in, interstate or foreign commerce. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:59 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Premier Dealer Services, Inc. had received in Illinois federal courts, which is set forth in my March 6 post "Fifield, Federal Style. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Premier Dealer Services, which altered the landscape of noncompete law in Illinois by seemingly declaring a bright-line rule that an employee must have worked for his or her employer for two years in order for the employer to subsequently enforce a noncompete clause. [read post]