Search for: "Filler v State" Results 21 - 40 of 179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2021, 1:18 pm by Michael
Intentional infliction of emotional distress is a considered a “gap filler” tort that should not be extended to circumvent the limitations placed on a recovery of mental anguish damages under a more established tort doctrine. [read post]
3 May 2021, 3:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
Unsurprisingly, after class last Fall, a student at Rutgers Law School in New Jersey asked a professor about one of those 10,000+ cases—State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 11:30 am by luiza
 An image from the government’s complaint shows the difference (U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
These are real risks which have to be weighed against the benefits of self-regulation including independence from the state and the application of valuable expertise and experience to the realities of practice. [read post]