Search for: "Fire Suppression Systems, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
  As part of the SEQRA review, the Town’s fire marshal  required installation of a fire-suppression system, and identified other measures to minimize the risk of explosions. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:30 am by Chip Merlin
LeBow examined, among other things, the exhaust filters, and the chemical fire suppression system. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 1:18 pm by Patricia Salkin
New Horizons contended that “DHS denied a reasonable accommodation here by denying the variance request that would have allowed the home to open without a commercial fire suppression system. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:53 pm by Alicia Maule
In total, there have so far been five cases — including Booker’s — in which murder charges have been thrown out as a result of Kurtzrock’s illegal suppression of evidence. [read post]
26 May 2019, 12:29 pm by John Floyd
  Further, the Texas Supreme Court some thirty-four years ago recognized in Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 11:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
FireBlok owns a patent on a system and method for suppressing fire in electrical boxes using intumescent material. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm by Kathryn Briuglio
., when a yacht ran aground, the yacht owner submitted a claim with the marine insurer under its policy.[1] The marine insurer denied coverage on the grounds that the owner misrepresented the yacht’s fire-suppression system’s ability, regardless of the fact that the vessel’s damage was not caused by fire. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm by Kathryn Bruiglio
., when a yacht ran aground, the yacht owner submitted a claim with the marine insurer under its policy.[1] The marine insurer denied coverage on the grounds that the owner misrepresented the yacht’s fire-suppression system’s ability, regardless of the fact that the vessel’s damage was not caused by fire. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 7:11 am by MBettman
 The appeals court held the trial court had abused its discretion in excluding evidence of the fire-suppression system, which the Linerts had offered to prove that Ford had notice of a potential fire risk in the CVPI after its sale. [read post]
EID sought to replace approximately three miles of an unlined earthen ditch system with a buried water transmission pipeline proposed to be located either beneath the ditch itself or beneath a berm located alongside the ditch. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:36 pm by MBettman
In regard to this claim, the appeals court also held that the trial court erred in excluding evidence that after the sale of the CVPI, Ford offered a fire suppression system on these cars. [read post]