Search for: "First United Corporation"
Results 21 - 40
of 20,194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2010, 2:02 pm
In particular, concession theory is plainly inconsistent with the contractarian model of the firm, which treats corporate law as nothing more than a set of standard form contract terms provided by the state to facilitate private ordering.(6) In the narrow context of Citizens United's First Amendment entitlements, it's irrelevant whether "corporate legal theory" – meaning the contractarian model -- takes "the concession theory… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:31 am
Ronald Dworkin criticizes the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision — ruling that corporations are entitled under the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech to an unlimited right to contribute money to political campaigns — for the same two reasons I have. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:19 am
Jackson opines that “the decision will help bring corporate political speech decisions into line with the interests of shareholders” in the wake of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm
See Citizens United v FEC: The First Amendment Rights of Corporate "Persons". [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:34 pm
Total assets for Oakland-based First United Corporation grew by $197.6 million for the quarter ending June 20, a 13.7% increase when compared to total assets at Dec. 31, 2019, due to loan and deposit growth of 13.4% and 18.4%, respectively. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 12:16 pm
First United Corporation, an Oakland-based bank holding company, Wednesday announced that it has earned a five-star rating from BauerFinancial, the nation’s leading independent bank and credit union rating and research firm. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:59 am
The post United Auto Workers Challenged Corporate Greed and Won Big appeared first on Public Citizen. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 7:08 am
For those interested in the corporate personhood issue, Professor Bainbridge has several posts on the matter: Citizens United v FEC: The First Amendment Rights of Corporate "Persons" Citizens United, Corporate Personhood, and Nexus of Contracts Theory Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 1:54 pm
The post Corporate Whistleblowers Must First See the SEC appeared first on HRWatchdog by Gail Cecchettini Whaley. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:15 pm
Read fairly, Citizens United merely says that banning certain kinds of corporate expenditures infringes the constitutional interests of human beings. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 7:54 am
Continue reading "Corporate Law as Law"The post Corporate Law as Law appeared first on Jotwell. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:09 am
The Wall Street Journal’s James Taranto spoke with First Amendment God Floyd Abrams a few days ago about the Citizens United decision banning bans on corporate political speech: “Here is a very committed, very conservative entity that does a film attacking then-Sen. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 10:13 am
" Citizens United and its supporters are portraying their case as a fight over the meaning of the First Amendment, but this obscures the far more fundamental question that underlies their claim. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:21 am
Unleashed by Citizens United, corporations... [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:45 pm
For example, will corporate decision-making that produces corporate speech be exempt from the First Amendment? [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 1:40 pm
The United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Arizona will have to decide whether a corporation organized under tribal law is a “corporation” for purposes of the Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
20 May 2019, 2:26 pm
The post Supreme Court Declines to Hear Corporate Contribution Case appeared first on LobbyComply. [read post]
17 May 2008, 4:43 am
In researching United First Financial and the Money Merge Account, there weren’t many sources of information on the compensation structure for agents. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 2:41 pm
first appeared on Cross-Border Counselor. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 7:21 am
Citizen's United is typically billed as a case about the First Amendment and campaign finance law. [read post]
