Search for: "Fisher v. Major"
Results 21 - 40
of 800
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2012, 4:07 pm
” Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:57 pm
I previously blogged about Fisher v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:39 pm
(David Bernstein) My contribution to Scotusblog’s symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
The Problem with Affirmative Action After Grutter: Some Reflections on Fisher v. University of Texas
6 Mar 2012, 8:30 pm
It’s official: the Supreme Court will hear Fisher v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 12:20 pm
Why did the Supreme Court decide to take Fisher v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Many facets of Wednesday’s oral argument in the Fisher v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:02 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:39 pm
That’s what the case of Fisher v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm
This Term – with Fisher v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
Bakke and after Gratz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 1:11 pm
As I noted earlier today at Education Law Prof Blog, the Court neither upheld nor struck down the Texas higher education admissions policy in Fisher v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm
Fisher’s lawyers had taken her constitutional challenge to the Supreme Court, arguing that the university had not justified the race-conscious part of its admissions plan that it adopted in the wake of the 2003 decision by the Justices in a University of Michigan Law School case (Grutter v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:46 am
"I wrote the majority opinion for the panel. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 1:07 pm
Filburn and Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
And it's moderately interesting that the Court has not yet issued its opinion in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 11:35 am
[Fisher II had a four-member majority. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:27 pm
Fisher is the named plaintiff in Fisher v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 11:57 am
Judge Fisher dissents, the opening paragraph of which reads:"When a sitting juror is alleged to have continuously texted a judge friend about the trial and relayed the judge’s information to the jury, the majority concludes the trial court need not investigate further – and the jury verdict would not violate due process. [read post]
15 May 2017, 12:35 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2012, 12:57 pm
The last major Voting Rights Act case, Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
