Search for: "Flaherty, Appeal of" Results 21 - 40 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2023, 4:18 pm
The 6th District imposes hefty appellate sanctions ($60,391.11 to respondent  plus $8,500 to the clerk of court) against an appellant and his counsel in an unpub'd decision here today:We decide that this appeal is frivolous under the Flaherty standard in light of the clear application of the law of the case doctrine. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:11 am
Sortino of the Los Angeles Superior Court, will be sitting Pro-Tem in Division Eight until May 31, 2017.Today's DJ features Gary Watt on Frivolous Appeals, in which he discusses the classic In re Marriage of Flaherty (1982) 31 Cal.3d 637, and concludes: It's complete lack of objective merit that makes an appeal frivolous. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 8:33 am
Albert is no stranger to the appeal process, having represented herself in some 12 appeals in this court alone. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 6:45 am
The Court determined Flaherty knew the records he attached to and referenced in his appeal were confidential. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:10 am by RCoffield@fsblaw.com
Supreme Court vacated a ruling by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia in the matter of Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 11:37 am
The opinion explains "nine out of the ten claims of error presented in the opening brief are frivolous under the Flaherty standard. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 7:00 am
At Flaherty & Merrifield, we offer our clients the following:Individualized attention. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:41 pm by Gary A. Watt
  (In re Marriage of Flaherty (1982) 31 Cal.3d 637, 649-650.) [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:28 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:10 am
Supreme Court vacated a ruling by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia in the matter of Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. [read post]