Search for: "Flores v City of New York" Results 21 - 40 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm by Doug Kendall
Perhaps National Review editor (and prominent conservative) Ramesh Ponnuru put it best in a blistering op-ed in the New York Times that appeared shortly after the most recent Voting Rights Act case, NAMUDNO v Holder, came down: [W]hen it comes to the race cases before the Supreme Court, too many conservatives abandon both originalism and judicial restraint. . . . [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997), it remains applicable to the federal government, see, e.g., Burwell v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 2:55 pm by Ryan Emenaker
In fact, New York, California, and Mississippi (all of which are covered at least in part by the automatic formula) filed a combined amicus brief arguing that the preclearance requirement should be upheld. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
He moved to the United States at age 13 and attended public school in New York City. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 8:25 am
City of New York, 487 U.S. 1, 14, 108 S.Ct.2225, 101 L.Ed.2d 1 (1988). [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 7:11 am by Bethany Berger
Washington, joined by an amicus brief from 12 other states and the city of New York, argues that affirmance would permit Yakama and the other tribes to evade taxes on all kinds of goods — particularly cigarettes — simply by importing them by highway. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 4:55 pm by JB
City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 (1998).As I understand it, the rule to be employed by the House for the consideration of the reconciliation measure will state that, upon passage of the reconciliation measure by the House, the House concurs in the amendments to H.R. 3590 passed by the Senate. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:01 am
The court looks at the 10th Amendment but distinguishes this case from Printz and New York v. [read post]