Search for: "Florian v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2013, 10:20 am
Less than ten hours later, Apple scored another win over the Google subsidiary: the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit just denied a motion by Motorola Mobility for a rehearing. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:51 pm
Wow, this Epic Games v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 10:23 pm
The factual record developed by the ALJs is, however, also available to the United States Trade Representative (USTR), to whom U.S. presidents typically delegate their Presidential veto power over ITC exclusion orders. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 10:46 am
The renewed Ericsson v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 12:32 pm
Two weeks after the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its opinion in Alice v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 9:28 am
Apple judgment says.The consolation prize that is the Epic Games v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 10:05 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has just published its long-awaited FTC v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 2:12 am
Qualcomm, there's also a short but interesting ruling that United States Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 8:13 pm
In connection with the FTC's antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm, Magistrate Judge Nathaniel Cousins of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California crafted a "Christmas present" for Apple that the iPhone maker would probably have liked to return to the shop immediately: a sanctions order ($25K per day starting December 16) and a December 29 deadline for the production of documents. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:11 pm
Second, the United States Federal Trade Commission filed a petition for rehearing en banc (meaning an enlarged panel of 11 circuit judges) by the Ninth Circuit of its Qualcomm case (this post continues below the document):20-09-25 FTC Petition for N... by Florian MuellerThe FTC won in district court, but a three-judge panel ruled for Qualcomm on all counts last month. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 1:01 pm
Orrick of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California still didn't necessarily have to stay the related infringement claims. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 7:16 pm
The Supreme Court opinion in Christianson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 7:20 am
Williams (@PaulWilliamsDC), Alexandra Koch (@alexandraekoch) and Lilian Waldock The American Servicemembers’ Protection Act and the Dodd Amendment: Shaping United States Engagement with the ICC (Part II) by Floriane Lavaud (@FlorianeLavaud), Ashika Singh and Isabelle Glimcher (@IsGlimcher) The Binding Interpretation by the Office of Legal Counsel of the Laws Constraining US Engagement with the ICC (Part III) by Floriane Lavaud… [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 10:46 am
A third VLSI v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am
— Florian Mueller (@FOSSpatents) February 25, 2021 For state legislatures, the in-app payment part is particularly intriguing because lawmakers can directly benefit consumers in their states and, potentially, attract app development companies. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 10:50 pm
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is still working on her decision on Epic Games' motion for a preliminary injunction against Apple. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 2:48 am
Several of these states took a contrary position just months ago in Apple v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 3:43 am
Feb. 27, 2020);Statement of Interest of the United States; Lenovo (United States) Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 9:04 am
In light of uncertainty surrounding the U.S. government's ability to operate after Monday (September 30) due to a budget impasse in Congress, the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) today filed a contingent motion with the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, requesting in the event of a government shutdown a postponement of a Motorola v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:02 am
Curiel of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California has just (this morning by Pacific Time) handed down two decisions denying a couple of Qualcomm motions for preliminary injunctions. [read post]
