Search for: "Foote v. Grant"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,783
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2021, 8:10 am
It was the only new case in which the justices granted review. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:31 am
However, local ordinances required a six foot setback distance. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in McCullen v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part IV addresses the practical implications of applying equitable apportionment to groundwater, after which the discussion turns, in Part V, to Mississippi’s argument that this case must be decided based upon the equal footing doctrine, rather than equitable apportionment. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part IV addresses the practical implications of applying equitable apportionment to groundwater, after which the discussion turns, in Part V, to Mississippi’s argument that this case must be decided based upon the equal footing doctrine, rather than equitable apportionment. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part IV addresses the practical implications of applying equitable apportionment to groundwater, after which the discussion turns, in Part V, to Mississippi’s argument that this case must be decided based upon the equal footing doctrine, rather than equitable apportionment. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part IV addresses the practical implications of applying equitable apportionment to groundwater, after which the discussion turns, in Part V, to Mississippi’s argument that this case must be decided based upon the equal footing doctrine, rather than equitable apportionment. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part IV addresses the practical implications of applying equitable apportionment to groundwater, after which the discussion turns, in Part V, to Mississippi’s argument that this case must be decided based upon the equal footing doctrine, rather than equitable apportionment. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
Part IV addresses the practical implications of applying equitable apportionment to groundwater, after which the discussion turns, in Part V, to Mississippi’s argument that this case must be decided based upon the equal footing doctrine, rather than equitable apportionment. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 7:32 am
” Skow v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Sherman v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 9:13 pm
The primary dispute of this case involved the Board’s grant of a height variance allowing LG to construct a 143.8–foot office building in a business zone where the maximum permitted building height was 35 feet. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 4:18 pm
The petitions for review were granted in American Legion v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:14 am
The case, Armour, et al., v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:46 pm
T–Mobile applied for a use variance to erect a 150–foot monopole that was to have a six-foot lightning rod on top and support up to nine antennae. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 6:52 am
The trial court granted Anne Arundel County summary judgment. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:35 am
In Foote v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 7:39 am
Regardless of the approach eventually settled on by the UPC, the decision in K-fee v Nespresso is a reminder for constant vigilance in European prosecution if patentees are to avoid shooting themselves in the foot with respect to their US patent strategy. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 9:24 pm
Metairie Club Gardens Association, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:15 am
Supreme Court today granted certiorari in McCullen v. [read post]
