Search for: "Forbes v. State of Georgia*" Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2017, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed in Forbes, Richard Samp weighs in on Jennings v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Nicholas Malfitano, Penn Record/Forbes, earlier on Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
It appears that the reserved judgments in the important cases of PNM v Times Newspapers and Lachaux v Independent Print – which were both heard before Flood – will not be handed down this term. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, the court issued a unanimous opinion in Shaw v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 7:42 am by Ben
 The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am by Amy Howe
In a number of cases out of Ohio, the perennial battleground state in presidential elections, the Sixth Circuit has found lack of uniform rules in the state to raise Bush v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 7:43 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
The connection with Georgia State is mostly found in the fact that the opinion in Katz v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:56 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:31 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The “public concern” test from employment cases is a poor fit for the reasons stated by the dissent. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at… [read post]