Search for: "Foster v. Simon" Results 21 - 40 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 1:16 pm by Rebecca Yergin
In reaching this conclusion, the Commission’s Opinion initially decided that 1-800 Contacts’ settlements were not immune from antitrust review under FTC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 2:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Sharpe, citing Justice Cardozo in the 1937 American case of Palko v. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
On 7 November 2017 the trial of Jake Wallis Simons v Craig Murray will begin. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:01 pm by Bill Marler
An Article I wrote in 2001 Bill Neuman wrote yet another article on cheese – “Raw Milk Cheesemakers Fret Over Possible New Rules” – after Food Safety News reported it and in follow-up to my five part series on raw milk and the “60 day rule” – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5, and the continuing outbreaks, illnesses and recalls linked to raw (unpasteurized) and pasteurized dairy products in the United… [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On 20 January 2017, Sir Davie Eady heard applications in the case of Daryanani -v- Ramnani. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:06 am by Bill Marler
With a Salmonella Outbreak raging, might be a good time to ask that question – again. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am by Ben
 BASCA chairman Simon Darlow has used his speech at the 2015 Ivor Novello Awards to criticise current 'safe harbour' provisions in EU and US law, pointing out that the likes of YouTube undermine streaming services, and were exploiting safe harbour legislation saying this was "undermining the value of our music". [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am by Andrew Hamm
” In another story for The National Law Journal (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports that Stephen Bright was “surprised” when the Court granted Foster v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:05 pm
  Never too late 41 [week ending on Sunday 12 April] – Nagoya Protocol for dummies | The IPKat and his friends | Actial Farmaceutica Lda v Claudio de Simone | Article 5(5) of the EU's Trade Mark Directive 2008/95 | Article 16(3) of our beloved TRIPS | Italy v Spain in copyright enforcement online. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
  Never too late 41 [week ending on Sunday 12 April] – Nagoya Protocol for dummies | The IPKat and his friends | Actial Farmaceutica Lda v Claudio de Simone | Article 5(5) of the EU's Trade Mark Directive 2008/95 | Article 16(3) of our beloved TRIPS | Italy v Spain in copyright enforcement online. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
 Never too late 41 [week ending on Sunday 12 April] – Nagoya Protocol for dummies | The IPKat and his friends | Actial Farmaceutica Lda v Claudio de Simone | Article 5(5) of the EU's Trade Mark Directive 2008/95 | Article 16(3) of our beloved TRIPS | Italy v Spain in copyright enforcement online. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
  * Privacy in focus: urban life watching is art in New York StateValentina writes on Foster v Svenson, an Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court decision regarding people taking pictures of their neighbours. [read post]