Search for: "Fox et al. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2011, 3:07 am by tom
UNITED STATES 09-11556    TOLENTINO, JOSE v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:38 am by Matthew David Brozik
As if the plaintiff roster in the two cases weren’t impressive enough, the amici dramatis personae is a Who’s Who of important institutions: the NBA, NFL, NHL, and MLB; Paramount Pictures, Warner Bros., the Directors Guild of America, SAG-AFTRA, the Writers Guild of America, MGM, et al.; ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, et al.; Ralph Oman, former Register of Copyrights of the United States—all in support of the plaintiffs-appellants—and… [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm by Alka Bahal
On November 11, 2021 American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) and its litigation partners Wasden Banias and Steven Brown, announce the historic settlement with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in Shergill, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am by Tobias Thienel
This had been stated by a narrow minority of the European Court of Human Rights in Al-Adsani v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:56 am by christopher
Finally, it chides both sets of attorneys for failing to cite the United States Supreme Court case of DASTAR CORP. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 11:08 am
Fox Television Stations, Inc., et al. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
Fox Television Stations, Inc., et al. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:02 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Image via WikipediaThe United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit yesterday upheld its 2008 ruling that the Federal Communications Commission acted "arbitrarily and capriciously" when it fined CBS Corp. $550,000 for airing the 2004 Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime wardrobe malfunction that caused Justin Timberlake to bare Janet Jackson's breast for an entire nine-sixteenths of a second (see "TUOL" post 9/17/09).As reported by the Associated Press, the… [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:28 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Pity the docket and courtroom clerks at the United States District Court for the Central District of California, who are trying not to confuse separate Barry Diller and BarryDriller lawsuits.A little more than a week after a copyright and trademark infringement suit, Fox Television Services, Inc. et al. v. [read post]