Search for: "Fox v. Green" Results 21 - 40 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Debbie Kaminer, Religious Accommodation in the American Workplace: The Impact of the Supreme Court's Decision in EEOC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:38 pm by Jared Sulzdorf
 David Silverman has an excellent review of the "landmark" Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
For Fox News, Bill Mears reports that “[a]dvocates on both sides of the issue” in Wednesday’s case, Carpenter v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Sac and Fox Nation, 654 Fed.Appx. 376 (10th Cir. 2016) (favoring tribal interests in tribal exhaustion matter) Ute Indian Tribe v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The Court summarized the law on vested rights in New York as follows: " a vested right can be acquired when, pursuant to a legally issued permit, the landowner demonstrates a commitment to the purpose for which the permit was granted by effecting substantial changes and incurring substantial expenses to further the development" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d 41, 47; see Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d 542, 544; Matter of Lefrak Forest Hills Corp.… [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 7:30 am
See, for example: Trust and Loan Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
” On 29 June 2017 Green J handed down judgment in the case of Hussain v Sandwell Metropolitan BC [2017] EWHC 1641 (Admin) which contains some interesting discussion of data protection principles applicable to publication of information. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:28 pm by Kiera Flynn
Briefly: Yesterday in Camreta v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
Birss J's decision in the post-Svensson debateIn case 20th Century Fox and Others v Sky UK and Others, Birss J addresses last-generation torrent software Popcorn, which is worrying right holders all over the world. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Federalist Society Review, Richard Raile argues that last term’s decision in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]