Search for: "Frame v. Residency Appeals Committee" Results 21 - 40 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
This regulation is clearly framed to mirror religious structures similar to that of the Roman Catholic church, where officials take a “lifetime commitment,” and not based on other faiths where spiritual leaders may have different, less-permanent approaches to devotion. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:15 am by Máiréad Enright
’ Forced married is not yet criminalised in the UK and is generally regulated at civil law. [1] Yesterday, the UK Supreme Court began to hear oral arguments in Bibi v SSHD (reported at High Court and Court of Appeal as Quila v SSHD.) [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am by Marie Louise
(PatLit) (IP:JUR) ‘Damages for infringing invalid patents’: a comment (PatLit) The inescapable trap enlarged: EPO Technical Board of Appeal decision in Unilever v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 11:07 am by Jordan Brunner
Quinta Jurecic posted the recording of the Ninth Circuit oral argument from Washington v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
  Moreover, Arizona can, and says it will, appeal her decision. [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:02 am
"   ValuesAs Reynolds explains, the lead Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, Sen. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
  (Why all three involved residents of northern Ohio is something of a mystery, like why Rey has a British accent.) [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:33 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
"  After offering an onerous appeal process, the bill states (in sec. 286.31(5)(g)) that "[f]ines that remain unpaid for a period in excess of 100 days after final determination are eligible for recovery through the courts of this state. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Marilyn Hall Patel, Chief District Judge, Presiding. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:24 am by John Mikhail
” This proposal was adopted by the convention and sent to the Committee of Detail, which then produced a list of enumerated powers that later became Article I, Section 8. [read post]