Search for: "Frank's International, LLC"
Results 21 - 40
of 456
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2015, 2:09 am
Neo@Ogilvy LLC reversed and remanded a decision of the SDNY, which had dismissed a claim for retaliation by a former employee on the basis that Dodd-Frank’s whistleblower protections apply only to employees discharged for reporting violations to the SEC and not to employees who report violations only internally. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:43 am
Energy United States, LLC, that an employee who only reports a suspected violation internally is not a protected whistleblower for the purposes of Dodd-Frank’s anti-relation provision. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 11:23 am
Neo@Ogilvy LLC, WPP Group USA, Inc., saw Clause (iii) as ambiguous, invoked Chevron, and chose to defer to Rule 21F-2. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 12:40 pm
GRAND VISION GAMING, LLC, TIMOTHY CARSON, and MERLE FRANK, and JOHN DOES 1-10. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:43 am
Energy United States, LLC, that an employee who only reports a suspected violation internally is not a protected whistleblower for the purposes of Dodd-Frank’s anti-relation provision. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:13 am
” Do Dodd-Frank’s Anti-Retaliation Provisions Protect Individuals Who Report Internally? [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 8:42 am
Neo@Ogilvy LLC, WPP Group USA, Inc. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 8:29 am
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC et al., 3:15-cv-00074 (E.D. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:39 am
Energy (USA), LLC, No. 12-345 (S.D. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:53 am
VW Contributor: Ryan Coufal © 2019 Vandenack Weaver LLC For more information, Contact Us [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
FMR LLC). [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 3:58 pm
Federal courts have split on the question of whether Dodd-Frank protects whistleblowers who only report internally. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
FMR LLC, which we have previously covered in various posts. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 8:03 am
GE Energy USA, LLC, 720 F.3d 620 (5th Cir. 2013), that employees are not protected under the whistleblower retaliation protection provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act unless they report their concerns to the SEC, many courts have become confused about the reach of these important whistleblower protections. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 5:42 am
Neo@Oglivy LLC, the Second Circuit found the statutory provisions to be ambiguous, and applied so-called “Chevron deference” to the SEC’s interpretation of the statute, to conclude that the anti-retaliation provisions protected whistleblowers whether they had made their report to the SEC or had made it internally. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:23 am
Energy (USA), LLC, 720 F.3d 620 (5th Cir. 2013)—the district court focused on the fact that the plaintiff “did not report any information to the Commission prior to the alleged retaliatory acts” and, for that reason, held that the plaintiff was not covered by the Dodd-Frank whistleblower protections. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:35 am
Rather, internal whistleblowing that is protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is protected activity sufficient to state a claim under Dodd-Frank, according to the SEC. [read post]
1 May 2017, 4:15 pm
Neo@Oglivy LLC, the Second Circuit found the statutory provisions to be ambiguous, and applied so-called “Chevron deference” to the SEC’s interpretation of the statute, to conclude that the anti-retaliation provisions protected whistleblowers whether they had made their report to the SEC or had made it internally. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:33 am
The Dodd-Frank Act only permits a reward to be paid if sanctions ordered to be paid exceed $1 million. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:34 am
Additionally, a federal grand jury in San Juan, Puerto Rico, returned an indictment against Frank Peake, the former president of Sea Star Line, for his role in the same conspiracy. [read post]
