Search for: "Frank Kavanaugh" Results 21 - 40 of 141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2022, 7:54 am by Gus Hurwitz
[Wrapping up the first week of our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium is a post from Truth on the Market’s own Justin (Gus) Hurwitz, director of law & economics programs at the International Center for Law & Economics and an assistant professor of law and co-director of the Space, Cyber, and Telecom Law program at the University of Nebraska College of Law. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm by Elizabeth McElvein, Benjamin Wittes
The ruling thus seems to reserve for another day the question of whether a former president can assert the privilege—and Justice Kavanaugh actually wrote a short opinion explaining why he disagrees with the D.C. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:19 am
 Justice Thomas would have granted what was an application for stay of mandate and injunction pending review.Justice Kavanaugh wrote a statement that began: The Court of Appeals suggested that a former President may not successfully invoke the Presidential communications privilege for communications that occurred during his Presidency, at least if the current President does not support the privilege claim. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
Whether it leads to theocracy or balkanization, the creeping fusion of church and state is disastrous for the public good.Let’s be frank: religions need to obey the laws. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Justice Department is trying to extradite the contractor – Frank Rafaraci, chief executive of Multinational Logistics Services (MLS) – from Malta. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 7:07 am by John Jascob
Justice Barrett delivered the opinion, in which Justices Roberts, Breyer, Kagan and Kavanaugh joined in full. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Justice Barrett concurred, joined by Kavanaugh and Breyer. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 1:30 pm by Josh Blackman
Thomas, Kavanaugh, plus Gorsuch and Alito. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm by admin
., 139 S.Ct. 986 (2019), was a perfect canvas on which to sketch out tort law’s failure to come to grips with the three-way relationship among industrial product seller, sophisticated industrial or military purchasers and employers, and injured plaintiffs.[1] Many commentators might have viewed the justices who squared off in DeVries, Kavanaugh for the majority, Gorsuch for the dissent, as cut from the same judicial cloth, but their two opinions diverged in interesting ways. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am by Patrick McDonnell
On Dec. 9, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Collins v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 8:52 am by Howard Bashman
Judges calling balls and strikes: Circuit Judge Frank H. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm by Josh Blackman
The application was filed with Circuit Justice Kavanaugh on December 1. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:45 pm by Josh Blackman
Fourth, the majority–to be frank–adopted Justice Kavanaugh's "most favored" right approach. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 6:06 am by Howard Friedman
Indeed, the Governor is remarkably frank about this: In his judgment laundry and liquor, travel and tools, are all “essential” while traditional religious exercises are not. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:38 pm by Alejandro Camacho and Melissa Kelly
In their brief on the merits, the services emphasize that the deliberative process privilege was incorporated into exemption 5 because “effective governmental decisionmaking depends on agencies’ ability to have ‘frank discussion of legal or policy matters’ in writing. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Although that seat was eventually filled by now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Trump reportedly told advisers that he was “saving” Barrett in case Ginsburg stepped down during his presidency. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:33 am by Abbe R. Gluck
” The court used the doctrine to save two statutes this term after finding provisions of each unconstitutional: It saved the CFPB provisions of the Dodd Frank Act in Seila Law, and it saved the federal anti-robocall provisions of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act in Barr v. [read post]