Search for: "Free v. Chandler"
Results 21 - 40
of 145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2021, 6:36 pm
” Gonzalez v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:44 pm
Five more years would elapse before the sixth lone dissent in Chandler v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm
Salzburg et al. v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 1:25 pm
Chandler, 458 F. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 2:47 pm
Goldberg, After Frustration: Three Cheers for Chandler v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:31 pm
ZC v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust [2019] EWHC 2040 (QB) is a peculiar case on its facts and the judgment is well worth a read. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:14 am
(Pix: The Lady and the Unicorn: À mon seul désir (Musée national du Moyen Âge, Paris))The UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights has organized a session that may be of interest to some readers. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
Judgment was handed down on 22 November 2019 On 22 November 2019 Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Chandler v O’Connor [2019] EWHC 3181 (QB). [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:19 pm
EFF’s annual Pioneer Awards ceremony celebrates individuals and groups who have made outstanding contributions to freedom and innovation on the electronic frontier. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm
See, 04680-18 Cosentino v Thurrock Independent. 01735-18 Chandler v The New European, provisions 1 (accuracy), breach with the sanction of a correction by the publication 02176-18 Chandler v Mail on Sunday, provision 1, breach after investigation 04419-18 Muslim Council of Britain v The Times, provision 1, no breach after investigation Resolution Statement 04791-18 Legatum Institute Foundation v The Times, provision 1, resolved directly… [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 9:00 pm
According to a Supreme Court ruling in State of Arizona v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:29 pm
" Chandler v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
A&M Records, Inc. v. [read post]
