Search for: "Freeze v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 652
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2016, 7:53 am by Ellen Podgor
United States, the Supreme Court rules "[a] federal statute provides that a court may freeze before trial certain assets belonging to a criminal defendant accused of violations of federal health care or banking laws. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 8:38 am by Bruce Zagaris
  The court has  removed the freezing order on six of the accounts.[8] The judgment illustrates the utility of suspicious transactions reports, since in this case it triggered action by the Swiss Financial Intelligence Unit and then the prosecutor. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 8:38 am by Bruce Zagaris
  The court has  removed the freezing order on six of the accounts.[8] The judgment illustrates the utility of suspicious transactions reports, since in this case it triggered action by the Swiss Financial Intelligence Unit and then the prosecutor. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm by EEM
Travel ban news & commentary (in chronological order):Neither Facially Legitimate Nor Bona Fide–Why the Very Text of the Travel Ban Shows It’s Unconstitutional (Just Security, 9 June 2017) [text]"Trump Loses Travel Ban Ruling in Appeals Court," New York Times, 12 June 2017 [text]Challengers File Briefs in Supreme Court on Travel Ban, while 9th Circuit Leaves Freeze on Ban in Place (SCOTUSblog, 12 June 2017) [text]Ninth Circuit (Mostly) Upholds the Preliminary… [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:21 pm by Amy Howe
” In its brief on the merits, the United States starts by reiterating that, under the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:38 am by admin
District Court for the Southern District of New York is the latest decision in a series of cases that test the ability of U.S. firms to enlist the aid of foreign financial institutions in seeking relief on a range of claims, and the ability of U.S. courts to freeze assets outside the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:34 pm
Wells Fargo Bank decided by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, whose rulings apply to all of California and the far western United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 5:23 am by Amy Howe
United States, which “argues that if someone has spent or hidden their ill-gotten gain but has additional assets untainted by their crime, the government should be able to freeze the untainted assets. [read post]