Search for: "GARRETT v. DOWNING"
Results 21 - 40
of 190
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am
If you scroll down you will see why teaching this class has been enormously rewarding. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Garrett (2001) Nevada Department of Human Resources v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
In his study on family taxation, Bittker concluded that the ideal treatment of joint and single filers comes down to one’s assumptions about how the code should acknowledge the role of marriage and the family as a recognizable social, financial, and legal entity.[5] Avoiding the thornier questions of how the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) ought to evaluate marriage as a societal entity and parse income-earning members in a family,[6] if one accepts that married filers are simply… [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:58 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:52 pm
What Norma McCorvey Believed Matters By Mary Ziegler, Stearns Weaver Miller Professor, Florida State University College of Law Mary Ziegler argues that the recent revelation that Norma McCorvey—the plaintiff in Roe v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 11:43 am
The justices denied review in Wexford Health v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 4:04 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:06 pm
The Supreme Court Could Use the First Amendment to Unleash a Robocall Nightmare By Garrett Epps, Professor of Law, University of Baltimore School of Law Garrett Epps looks at the recently argued case, Barr v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am
” Yesterday’s second argument was in Barr v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 am
” At The Atlantic (via How Appealing), Garrett Epps hopes the court will summarily reverse a “rogue court [that] has had four chances to apply a foundational First Amendment precedent, and has bobbled it each time[:] That mistake, in a case called Mckesson v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 3:36 am
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps looks at the story behind a state constitutional provision relied on by Montana in Espinoza v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:47 pm
But California's position was greatly strengthened by the Supreme Court's May 2018 ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 4:08 am
Smith, in which the court two years ago struck down an Arkansas law that required the names of both mothers and fathers on birth certificates but not the names of both parents in same-sex marriages as inconsistent with Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:30 am
We know how they wear people down, particularly vulnerable people, and get them to admit to things just to get out of the windowless room. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
The Government website had a press release “Crack down on misuse of Non-Disclosure Agreements in the workplace”. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
The Supreme Court issued four opinions yesterday, bringing the total number of undecided cases down to 20. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
Briefly: At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps writes that last week’s decision in Nieves v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:07 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
