Search for: "GD v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
GD 08-10406 (Allegheny Co. 2009, Wettick, J.) [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:21 am
Blinn v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 9:57 am
In Church of Grace and Glory v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:43 am
GD 08-10406 (Allegheny Co. 2009, Wettick, J.) [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Brown and Safe Auto, No.: GD-13-002037 (C.P. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 2:29 pm
Gender dysphoria (GD), formerly listed as Gender Identity Disorder (GID), is a recognized mental disorder in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-V). [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:50 am
Wenger Contracting, Co. and Louis Wenger, commenced in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, under Index No. 31701-2008 (hereinafter Action No. 1), and David Wenger v Railroad Realty Group, Inc., ECS Realty Inc., GDS Realty Group, Inc., Woodglen Realty LLC, and Louis Wenger, commenced in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, under Index No. 2149-2009 (hereinafter Action No. 2), respectively. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
GD-12-008737 (C.P. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
GD-12-008737 (C.P. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
GD-20-010087 (C.P. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 8:43 pm
Hartford, 2008 W.L. 6653070, GD 07-Civil-002888 (Alleg. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 5:31 am
7 Dec Fronterion legal processing outsourcing predictions: Ten for 2012 http://bit.ly/veiwyB || LPO has transformed market but faces challenges 12 Dec @DannyErtel on legal process outsourcing: Selection criteria that are fit for purpose bit.ly/sLWfh7 || gd advice 4 GC looking at LPO 12 Dec e-Discovery Pippins v KPMG #eDiscovery: @chrisdaleoxford (http://bit.ly/rDDnmi) on Craig Ball’s http://bit.ly/s9y2xM || holds + proportionality 25 Nov … [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am
McGraw and State Farm Ins., GD 10-16523 (C.P. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am
McGraw and State Farm Ins., GD 10-16523 (C.P. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
OGD Equipment Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 1:57 pm
Trail v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:06 am
(Marek v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:42 pm
§ 1983 fails to state explicitly that punitive damages can be awarded. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
