Search for: "GIBBS v. GIBBS" Results 21 - 40 of 296
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2023, 12:28 am by Christin Thompson
Medicare Exclusion Risks: Employing Excluded Individuals Can Result in Significant Administrative, Civil and / or Criminal Liabilities (May 8, 2023): One of the most severe administrative sanctions available under the Social Security Act stems from the authority of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)[1] to “exclude” individuals and entities from participating in Federal health care programs.[2] While the… [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:52 pm by Kurt R. Karst
  FDA has in fact asserted this position in the past: CRL v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 7 December 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Schlumberger v Gibbs and another (QB-2019-004261). [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
Canada On 29 November 2022, judgement was handed down in Kaur v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 3:03 pm by Kimberly A. Kralowec
" The speakers are Andre Mura of Gibbs Law Group LLP; Zoe Savitsky of the Oakland City Attorney's Office; Steven E. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am by Frank Cranmer
And finally…II Per Julian Knowles J in Al-Masarir v Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2022] EWHC 2199 (QB) at [195]: “There are shades of Mandy Rice-Davies in this explanation — ‘they would say that, wouldn’t they? [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Although the petitioner failed to offer a reasonable excuse for his failure to timely serve the notice of claim, "the absence of a reasonable excuse is not fatal to the petition where there was actual notice and absence of prejudice" (Matter of Regan v City of New York, 131 AD3d at 1066; see Matter of Brownstein v Incorporated Vil. of Hempstead, 52 AD3d 507, 510; Gibbs v City of New York, 22 AD3d 717, 720; cf. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Although the petitioner failed to offer a reasonable excuse for his failure to timely serve the notice of claim, "the absence of a reasonable excuse is not fatal to the petition where there was actual notice and absence of prejudice" (Matter of Regan v City of New York, 131 AD3d at 1066; see Matter of Brownstein v Incorporated Vil. of Hempstead, 52 AD3d 507, 510; Gibbs v City of New York, 22 AD3d 717, 720; cf. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 1:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Golding v Martin (2022) EW Misc 2 (CC) We first saw this forfeiture case when it went to the Court of Appeal (our note). [read post]