Search for: "GOOGLE LLC v. PERSONALIZED MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, LLC " Results 21 - 40 of 236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
The social media outlet has also protested against the New York Times claim that its sharing of users personal data with smartphone firms’ constituted a breach of their privacy rights. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 13 April 2018 Warby J handed down judgment in the cases of NT1 and NT2 v Google LLC. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 12:10 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
The court does not lay out a definitive test for determining the character of the social media account (business or personal?) [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
On 11 March 2020 the Supreme Court (Lords Wilson, Briggs and Kitchin) has granted Google LLC permission to appeal against the order of the Court of Appeal in the case of Lloyd v Google LLC ([2019] EWCA Civ 1599) granting the representative claimant permission serve a representative claim out of the jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
On 26 January 2018 Rose J handed down judgment in the case of Appleby Global Group LLC v British Broadcasting Corporation & Anor [2018] EWHC 104 (Ch) refusing to transfer the “Paradise Papers” breach of confidence claim to the Media and Communications List of the Queen’s Bench Division. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The Social Media Law Bulletin has posted on a matter of judicial ethics arising from the case U.S. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 9:02 am by Aaron Rubin and Andrew Iwanicki
LeadClick Media, LLC, the court held that Donegan did qualify as an interactive computer service provider. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Senior executives from Facebook, Google and Twitter are scheduled to appear before UK MPs to answer questions about the spread of coronavirus disinformation. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has a post on the recent CJEU decision in the case of Peterson v Google LLC C-682/18 and C-683/18 – a copyright case which deals with the protections given hosting platforms by the E-Commerce Directive. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Al Saud & Anor v Forbes LLC & Ors heard 28 January 2015 (Sir Michael Tugendhat). [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Globe and Mail considers the accessibility and audience provided by social media in conjunction with the perils of sharing personal data on platforms. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The top 5 summer break posts were Practice Note: Media and Communications List becomes a Specialist List, new CPR 53, Practice Directions and Pre-Action Protocol Round up of the Media Law Cases in the 2018-2019 legal year: Six libel and privacy trials – Nataly Tedone. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 2:59 pm by Levin Papantonio
Google LLC., strongly urging SCOTUS to reverse the Ninth Circuit's decision broadly interpreting Section 230.Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that regulates internet service providers. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:41 pm by Barry Sookman
Last week Google lost another “right to be forgotten” case in the UK in NT 1 & NT 2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) (13 April 2018). [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
On 14 February 2018 there was a second PTR in the case of NT1 v Google LLC, before Warby J. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Barilaro v Google llc ([2022] FCA 650) Google was ordered to pay former New South Wales deputy premier John Barilaro $715,000 over a series of “racist” and “abusive” videos published on the YouTube channel Friendlyjordies. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
 The trial in NT2 v Google LLC took place before Warby J on 12 and 14 March 2018. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Pedro Alfaro v Taylor [2018] NSWDC 134 Gibson DCJ dismissed a libel action against the Guardian where the plaintiff refused to attend court and made a number of abusive communications to the Court. [read post]