Search for: "GRANT V. DEUTSCHE BANK" Results 21 - 40 of 207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2022, 5:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Winner’s conduct did not rise to the level of frivolous within the definition of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (see Rojas v Hazzard, 171 AD3d 819, 820; Deutsche Bank Natl. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 12:23 am by Jan von Hein
In the New York proceeding Zahava Rosenfeld, derivatively as a shareholder of Deutsche Bank AG and on behalf of Deutsche Bank AG v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 1:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
And there are still similar derivative cases pending against the boards of, among others, Deutsche Bank, Volkswagen, Barclays, and Novartis. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“To defeat a defendant’s motion, the plaintiff has no burden of establishing its standing as a matter of law; rather, the motion will be defeated if the plaintiff’s submissions raise a question of fact as to its standing” (Deutsche Bank Trust Co. [read post]
Background Following the US’ re-imposition of sanctions on Iran in 2018, Deutsche Telekom (Telekom) terminated its contract with Tehran-based Bank Melli Iran (the Bank). [read post]
3 May 2021, 4:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An order which does not decide a motion made on notice is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701[a][2]; Sholes v Meagher, 100 NY2d 333, 335; Deutsche Bank Natl. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Deutsche Bank AG, 943 F.3d 10 627, vacated and remanded on other grounds, 140 S. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Bryce Klehm
Deutsche Bank While Vance concerned presidential immunity to criminal process, the Supreme Court framed the congressional subpoena cases—Trump v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133, 144 n.11 (2d Cir. 2004) ("Once the cat is out of the bag, the ball game is over. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[v] This means compliance must be shown not only for plaintiff Jones but also for every offer and every sale in the “offering. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:17 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
As with the Mazars and Deutsche Bank cases, it is entirely unclear when—or even if—this case will ever be decided on the merits. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Julia Solomon-Strauss
” (Despite the case title, Mazars also involved subpoenas by congressional committees to Deutsche Bank and Capital One as well as Mazars.) [read post]
Three committees of the House of Representatives issued subpoenas last year to Mazars USA and two banks—Capital One and Deutsche Bank—for records relating to President Trump, his family, and their companies. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:06 am by Chris Stephens
Deutsche Bank AG, two cases that arose out of House Democrat efforts to subpoena Trump’s financial records from when he was a private citizen. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am by Charlotte Butash
Mazars, Deutsche Bank and Capital One declined to take a position in the litigation. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:16 am by Charlotte Butash, Margaret Taylor
Deutsche Bank––involve the validity of subpoenas issued for the president’s financial records and are set to be argued on May 12. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:14 pm by Angela Mauroni
Deutsche Bank AG was heard before the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:56 am by Jonathan H. Adler
While it did not grant any new cases for argument, it did something interesting in Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 7:37 am by Francis Pileggi
Vice Chancellor Glasscock found evidence that several high-ranking Nuveen bond specialists warned Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank and J.P. [read post]