Search for: "GRANT v. REEVES" Results 21 - 40 of 210
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
IPSO 11269-22 The Alba Party v The Times Scotland, 1 Accuracy (2021), Decision: No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement – 10206-22 Forde & Doyle v The Argus, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 14 Confidential sources (2021), Resolved – IPSO Mediation 09453-22 A woman v Daily Mirror, 14 Confidential sources (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Decision: No… [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 4:29 am by Charles Sartain
The central issue in Tier 1 Resources Partners v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 8:47 am by Josh Blackman
Judge Graves wrote the majority opinion in Campaign for Southern Equality v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Authentix Acquisition Company, Inc., September 13, 2021, Montgomery-Reeves, T.).The appraisal petitioners were the shareholders in a company that merged into Authentix Acquisition Co. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 7:02 am by Howard Bashman
Reeves, No. 20–1084, the Court issued a per curiam opinion. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm by John Elwood
The solicitor general recommends the court grant review. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am by John Elwood
The last scheduled conference of the Supreme Court’s term — which this term is being held Thursday — is usually one that yields many grants. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:02 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the Court of Appeals affirms the grant of summary judgment to management on the plaintiff's age discrimination claim even though she argued that multiple younger candidates were offered positions for which she was more qualified.The case is Peddy v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:54 pm by John Elwood
The court granted cert in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:39 am by John Elwood
New Mexico, involving the admissibility of expert reports under the Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause, the court granted review in Williams v. [read post]