Search for: "GRANT v. ROBERT et al" Results 21 - 40 of 725
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Welcome to this all-source repository of information for analysts, researchers, investigators, journalists, educators, and the public at large. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
In July, 2017, the stock of NYSE-traded Tahoe Resources dropped 33 percent when the Supreme Court of Guatemala suspended its license to operate the world’s third-largest silver mine.[14] The suspension was the result of a lawsuit claiming that the company ignored an Indigenous group’s right to consultation in advance of granting the license and was the culmination of a long history of alleged human rights violations in the area that went undisclosed to investors.[15]… [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Oklahoma; Certificate of Appealability) In re Gold King Mine Release in San Juan County, Colorado, on August 5, 2015 (CERCLA; Natural Resource Damages) Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:49 am by Unreported Opinions
CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INC., ET AL. first appeared on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm by centerforartlaw
”[18]Further, it was argued that while the claim of authorship by species other than homo sapiens may be novel, “authorship” under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C § 101 et seq., is sufficiently broad so as to permit the protection of the law to extend to any original work, including those created by Naruto. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm by centerforartlaw
”[18]Further, it was argued that while the claim of authorship by species other than homo sapiens may be novel, “authorship” under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C § 101 et seq., is sufficiently broad so as to permit the protection of the law to extend to any original work, including those created by Naruto. [read post]