Search for: "GRANTHAM v. US " Results 21 - 34 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
No muesli mix-up likely in the world where rabbits reignSupreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) is another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:06 pm
Earlier today this Kat posted this note on Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch), the latest in a line of important trade mark rulings from Mr Justice Arnold in the Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:18 am
 The case is Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch), yet another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, for England and Wales. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:44 am
It looks to me as if the life tenant, Robert Crawley, Earl of Grantham, could have barred the entail, but in fact he decided not to, because he did not want the estate to be broken up. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
P. 15.03 is to enable parties to correct the “mislabeling of a party they intended to sue,” Grantham v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:44 am by Ray Mullman
  He used to work for what he calls "the dark side," defending corporate nursing homes against such claims. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am by Ray Mullman
  That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 1:17 pm by Rosalind English
Ghoulish masks had the potential to cause anxiety, alarm and distress and could be used to seek to disguise the identity of anyone intent on harassing conduct. [read post]