Search for: "GRIFFIN v. MAYS"
Results 21 - 40
of 862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2014, 6:58 am
The style of the case is Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 12:43 pm
In the case of Griffin Industries, LLC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 4:49 pm
Authorities may never have noticed if the officer hadn’t gone on a fishing expedition in Griffin’s pockets. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 9:57 am
A1 South/Grand Rapids Griffins and held People v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:21 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 2:08 pm
May 25, 2016). [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 12:00 am
In Moore v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:28 pm
Transport for London (TfL) v Griffin & Ors [2012] EWHC 1105 (QB) - Read Judgment Transport for London (TfL) have succeeded in their High Court application for an injunction restraining Addison Lee Taxis from encouraging drivers to use London bus lanes. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
Wooten, The Coach's Pre-Game Prayer: Probably Wrong But Feels Right, (August 3, 2009).Thomas Charles Berg, Lemon v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:04 pm
Torts folks might be interested in a recent paper by Griffin Sims Edwards (Emory, Econ), Doing Their Duty: An Empirical Analysis of the Unintended Effect of Tarasoff v Regents on Homicidal Activity. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 8:11 pm
" (Griffin v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 1:43 pm
The Court issued this per curiam opinion today in Long Trusts v. [read post]
22 Jan 2005, 12:53 pm
In the case of Derendal v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:20 am
Automatic termination from public office by operation of lawSchirmer v Town of Harrison, USDC, SDNY, 1999 WL 61843Foley v Bratton, Court of Appeals, 92 NY2d 781 [Decided with Griffin v Bratton]Police officers are public officers and as such a subject to the provisions of Section 30.1 of the Public Officers Law. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Cas. at 26.In his opening brief, Donald Trump appeared to preserve this argument, though just barely: He didn’t devote any space to it.[1] His reply brief does even less with it than that, offering only the ambiguous sentence “that section 3 may be enforced only though the congressionally enacted methods of enforcement,” without even arguing that Chief Justice Chase got it right in Griffin’s Case. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 3:53 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 5:09 am
Home visits do not require a court order, and the probation search here satisfied Griffin. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Commission for Equality & Human Rights v Griffin, Lumby, Darby [2011] EWHC 675 (Admin) Read judgment The Commission for Equality & Human Rights has been ordered to pay costs of court proceedings to two members and a former member of the British National Party. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:02 am
Law Lessons from ANTOINE LEVAR GRIFFIN v. [read post]
