Search for: "GROW V. GROW" Results 21 - 40 of 11,607
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:07 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: The 2023 decision in Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:21 am by Tessa Shepperson
Section 21 court case appeal A case going forward to appeal, D’Aubigny v Khan could impact how a landlord communicates with their tenant going forward as this case hinges on whether crucial documentation issued at the start of tenancy is deemed as acceptable as being given to the tenants if it has been posted. [read post]
15 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Audit firms are private businesses with the same legitimate interest in making a profit that all private businesses have.[1] But audit firms have also been entrusted to be essential gatekeepers in maintaining the integrity of our capital markets. [read post]
11 May 2024, 6:56 am
 It is possible to identify three areas of current interest in relation to the control of cognition to advance the interests and aspiration of ideologically driven human collectives. [read post]
10 May 2024, 11:38 am
  Its mission is "to help people grow the UK economy by providing an IP system that encourages investment in creativity and innovation. [read post]
” Civil forfeiture is a growing practice, although the government does not always win. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:37 am by Stephen Rosenberg
Growing up in Baltimore in the Seventies (you can take the boy out of Baltimore but you can’t take the Orioles out of the boy – go Birds!) [read post]