Search for: "Gaines v. Howard" Results 21 - 40 of 235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
The tax gain for North Carolina is likely less than the tax loss for New York, while the lower effective (tax-reduced) price reduces costs for New York smokers. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney is liable under Judiciary Law § 487 (1) if he or she “[i]s guilty of any deceit or collusion, or consents to any deceit or collusion, with intent to deceive the court or any party,” and under Judiciary Law § 487 (2) if he or she “[w]illfully delays his [or her] client’s suit with a view to his [or her] own gain” (see Melcher v Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 23 NY3d 10, 12 [2014]; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d… [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
The main residence of Veraton, circa 1907. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:01 am by Matthew Tokson
Judges Sandra Lynch, Jeffrey Howard, and Gustavo Gelpí ruled against a warrant requirement for pole cameras. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:00 am by Matthew Tokson
 What about the other 3 judges, Judges Lynch, Howard, and Gelpi? [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:49 pm by Bill Marler
Discharged home after negative stool culture despite low platelet count with diagnosis of infectious colitis v. inflammatory bowel disease. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the second cause of action pleaded with the necessary particularity the elements of fraud against the law firm and Howard Fensterman (see Emby Hosiery Corp. v Tawil, 196 AD3d at 465). [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Iowa is phasing out its inheritance tax, while Maryland and Washington face litigation over new taxes on digital advertising and capital gains income respectively. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Christina Koningisor
The executive privilege recognized by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 4:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Howard Case In Howard v Pooler, 184 AD3d 1160 [4th Dept 2020], a minority member of a real estate development firm sued the majority member. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Ludmer In Law Society of Upper Canada v Brian Allan Ludmer, 2012 ONLSHP 191 and Law Society of Upper Canada v Brian Allan Ludmer, 2013 ONLSHP 114, Mr. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm by Chuck Cosson
”[19]  That is, despite the personal and legal risks of engaging in online crime, it will persist as an attractive pursuit, often for financial gain or espionage, but at times solely for purposes of egoic gratification.[20] Or, with respect to privacy, it makes itself known through advocacy seeking to shift emphasis from notice and choice to ethically bounded design choices. [read post]