Search for: "Garrison v. State of California"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Unless a convention of the states assembled pursuant to Article V proceeds to ignore the language of Article V, the current structure of the Senate cannot be changed, and even permissible amendments will need the assent of 38 states. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
California, 545 U.S. 162 (2005), that a State could not impose the burden on a defendant claiming a racially discriminatory striking of a juror pursuant to Batson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Park, University of California, Los Angeles , on Friday, June 3, 2016 Tags: Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Federalism, Investor protection, Misconduct, Rule 10b-5, Securities Act, Securities fraud, Securities regulation, Shareholder value, SOX, State law, Stock mispricing Remarks on Optimizing the Equity Markets Posted by Mary Jo White, U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:04 pm
Trades Council v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:42 pm
” The lawsuit, Blesch v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:18 am
White (Vanderbilt University), on Friday, October 8, 2021 Tags: Capital allocation, Executive Compensation, Liquidity, Market conditions, Repurchases, Shareholder value SEC Form 10-K Comments Regarding Climate-Related Disclosures Posted by Brian V. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:45 am
McLaughlin and Yafit Cohn, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Friday, May 13, 2016 Tags: Acquisition agreements, Contracts, Corporate fraud, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Due diligence, Fair values,Fairness review, Liability standards, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Reliance Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:39 am
Serio, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Tuesday, September 3, 2019 Tags: Appraisal rights, Delaware cases, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
Pastuszenski, Goodwin Procter LLP, on Tuesday, July 18, 2017 Tags: California, Class actions, Jurisdiction, New York, PSLRA, Securities Act, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, SLUSA, State law, Supreme Court CalPERS v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
It is not the case that such an election process to the United States House of Representatives is required by the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
(citing Franklin County School Board v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 11:11 am
United States, Shah v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:04 am
(Garrison v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:17 am
Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 7:07 am
by Lucía Falcón Palomar (@LuciaFalconP), Obinna Maduka and JoAnn Kamuf Ward (@JoAnnKWard) (April 8, 2021) COVID-19, California’s Wildfires, and Reimagining “The Reserves” by Jordan Beauregard (September 25, 2020) Humanitarianism … [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Ramos, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York, New York, for plaintiffs-appellees. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Garrison, Travis L. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 5:01 am
California (1927) to lynchings and KKK terror to the Brandenburg decision in 1969. [read post]
