Search for: "Gas Service Co. v. Hunt"
Results 21 - 35
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
Consequently, the requested disclosure fits squarely within the policy rationale underlying the physician-patient privilege.IF OBJECT OF UTILITY FEES IS TO FUND A CITY’SGENERAL REVENUE, THE HANCOCK AMENDMENT IS VIOLATED.Arbor Investment Co. owns property in the City of Hermann and paid utility charges for gas, electricity, water/sewer and refuse/waste. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
In inspections, the EPA said it found violations by Fafard, FRE Building Co. and Benchmark Engineering Corp. at sites in Holliston, Natick, Uxbridge, Milford, Marlborough and elsewhere. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
. - Amy Leigh Womack, Macon.com, February 16, 2010 Lawyers representing the city of Jeffersonville and the owners of a Twiggs County hunting plantation have drafted a consent order to try to settle a lawsuit alleging that the city violated the federal Clean Water Act. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Rev. 2550, 2550 (June 2001).AlabamaEx parte Household Retail Services, Inc., 744 So.2d 871, 880 n. 2 (Ala. 1999); Ex parte Exxon Corp., 725 So.2d 930, 933 n.3 (Ala. 1998).AlaskaWe didn’t find anything useful along these lines under Alaska law.ArizonaOsuna v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
In Great Oaks Water Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Lynn, MA; John Gillespie, President) All Stars Labor Service Inc. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:34 am
Ontario co. sales tax Last Act: 07/11/09 signed chap.9495
A3123
Bradley (MS) -- Authorizes the city of White Plains to impose an occupancy tax BLURB : Tax. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Ga. 2005), aff'd in pertinent part, 230 Fed. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 11:57 am
Montgomery Elevator Co., 225 Ga. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
Sargent is not compensated for news connected to a service or product. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
BE&K Construction Co. v. [read post]
