Search for: "Geary v. Geary" Results 21 - 40 of 74
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2015, 9:08 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Sarah Sessin, No. 110,054 (Geary)Direct appeal (petition for review); possessionRandall L. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:00 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Here is a Hutch News article reporting on an acquittal in State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:40 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Ronald Graham, No. 101,717 (Geary)Sentencing appeal/Cross-appeal K.S.A. 60-1507 appealSam S. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 10:10 pm
Again, the CAFC found that the district court disregarded the testimony of expert Geary. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:24 pm by Michael Atkins
Where: Swig, 561 Geary Street (near Union Square, behind the Westin St. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 12:59 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Stanton Holt, No. 105,854 (Geary)Motion for new trial appealSam S. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:19 am by John Diekman
It is for the jury to make determinations as to the credibility of the witnesses, and great deference is accorded to the jury, which had the opportunity to see and hear the witnesses.Case: Geary v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 7:29 am by michael
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) CRC Credit Fund Ltd & Ors v GLG Investments Plc (Sub-Fund: European Equity Fund) & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 917 (02 August 2010) TM (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 916 (30 July 2010) Sheffield City Council v Wall (Personal Representatives of) & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 922 (30 July 2010) ZA (Nigeria) & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 7:04 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Reginald Frazier, No. 117,456 (Geary)Motion to withdraw plea appeal (petition for review)Clayton J. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:40 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Tyler Regelman, No. 116,398 (Geary)State's appeal (petition for review); Possession of MarijuanaAmber Cabrerra[Affirmed/reversed; Biles; December 7, 2018]Whether questions regarding marijuana odor were custodialNo probable cause to search homeState v. [read post]