Search for: "General Ship Corp. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2019, 8:16 am by Ingrid Wuerth
The statute generally requires a nexus between the lawsuit and the United States, although sometimes that nexus is weak, raising issues of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 9:49 am by Gene Quinn
While the Supreme Court acknowledged that courts ordinarily presume that statutes apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, quoting Foley Bros. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:32 am by Ashley Deeks
Thus, the United States might conclude generally that the use of mines by the IRGC to damage commercial vessels constitutes an act that triggers a right of self-defense, at least for the flag state. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The title of the article is The Quiet Coup, and it's introductory paragraph changed my whole year… The crash has laid bare many unpleasant truths about the United States. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:51 pm by Louis M. Solomon
Malaysia Int’l Shipping Corp., 549 U.S. 422 (2007), holding that district court’s “may decide forum non conveniens motions even though jurisdictional issues remain unresolved”. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 12:32 am by James Yang
  It manufactured the components for its competing system in the United States and then shipped them to companies abroad. [read post]