Search for: "Geoghegan v. Geoghegan"
Results 21 - 23
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2011, 1:45 am
(See, Fajujonu v Minister for Justice [1990] 2 IR 151). [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Cause of action In Foley v Independent Newspapers Ltd [1994] 2 ILRM 61, 67, Geoghegan J held that once the competing constitutional rights are balanced, the plaintiff’s entitlement to succeed under the ordinary laws of libel was unaffected. [read post]
