Search for: "Gertz v. Gertz" Results 21 - 40 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2014, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
The specific legal issue that the Ninth Circuit was confronting in this passage, by the way, is whether all who speak to the public are equally protected by the Gertz v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
And a few other courts, including the Oregon Supreme Court, expressly held that such First Amendment defamation rules, and especially the Gertz v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Here’s the Summary of Argument: Consistent with this Court’s repeated observation that “there is no constitutional value in false statements of fact,” Gertz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 7:14 am
Stepelton Roy Part IV: Michael Pillsbury Part V: Daniel Rosen Part VI: John J. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:59 am by Lawrence Solum
Nevertheless, I would argue that Sullivan is based on a faulty premise; namely, that all knowingly false factual assertions are devoid of constitutional value – a notion further reinforced by Gertz v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
We will assume that statements in this Court’s precedents that “there is no constitutional value in false statements of fact,” Gertz v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 12:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
 New York Times dealt with libel of public officials; Garrison also mentioned public officials, though also talked more broadly about "[d]ebate on public issues"; but Gertz v. [read post]