Search for: "Gill v. USA"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
At In a Crowded Theater, Erica Goldberg suggests that “[c]ataloging some of the instances where courts incorporate math helps illuminate how the Court should proceed in Gill v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am
” At FiveThirtyEight, Galen Druke “outline[s] seven potential paths the court could take,” in this term’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:59 am
” Commentary on the grant in Benisek comes from Rick Hasen at the Election Law Blog and Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who notes “several differences” between Benisek and the court’s other pending partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am
” At The Hill, Jacqueline Thomsen reports that “[a] top sociology group fired back at Supreme Court Justice John Roberts for referring to sociology as “’gobbledygook’” during the oral argument last week in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 6:59 pm
Dimaya (October 2) Gill v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am
At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen lines up the reasons why Justice Anthony Kennedy might take one side or the other in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
Benisek v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
” At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that “if the justices don’t reach a final conclusion” in this term’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
The first was Gill v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:36 am
This exploration integrates the rhizomatic theory of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, proposed in 1987, which suggests a non-linear, network-like framework for understanding legal changes. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr notes that the Supreme Court’s high-profile partisan-gerrymandering case, Gill v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse remarks on the differences between the court’s two pending partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:22 am
” In an op-ed for USA Today, Brandon Garrett urges the justices to review Dassey v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
” For USA Today, Richard Wolf contrasts Benisek with Gill v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Richard Pildes observes that after yesterday’s October-sitting opinion from Justice Neil Gorsuch, “it is most likely that Chief Justice Roberts is writing the opinion for the Court in [partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am
” Briefly: At the Election Law Blog, Christopher Elmendorf and Eric McGhee respond to Justice Neil Gorsuch’s complaint at last week’s oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 12:53 pm
Common Cause, No. 18-422, Supreme Court of the United States (Mar. 9, 2019); Brief of 44 Election Law, Scientific Evidence, and Empirical Legal Scholars as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellees, in Gill v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
This uncontroversial analysis was applied in MAB (USA) [2015] UKUT 435. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:24 am
Exergen Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
The editorial board of The Washington Post weighs in on this week’s two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Gill v. [read post]
